Process, end to end
Follow a quote through to cash and a purchase through to payment, writing down every system and spreadsheet involved. The handoffs you find are usually where the value of an ERP sits.
A practical selection guide: how to gather requirements that mean something, build a shortlist worth demoing, run demos that reveal fit rather than polish, and compare total cost honestly before you commit.
Most ERP selections start in the wrong place: a list of products, a set of vendor websites and a series of demos. By the time the third demo finishes, everything looks capable, the differences have blurred, and the decision quietly reduces to price and whoever presented best.
The businesses that end up happy with their ERP almost always did the same thing first. They wrote down how the business actually runs, where it breaks, and what the new system has to change. That document is what turns a demo from a sales presentation into a test, and it is what makes competing quotes comparable.
It also protects you from the most expensive outcome in ERP, which is not choosing the wrong product. It is choosing a perfectly good product and configuring it around processes nobody examined, so the business pays to automate its existing problems.
The rest of this guide walks through the stages in order: requirements, shortlisting, demos, cost comparison, references and the partner decision. Expect the whole process to take eight to sixteen weeks for a mid-sized organisation.
A requirements document is not a feature checklist. It is a description of how your business runs and what has to be different afterwards. These are the areas worth covering.
Follow a quote through to cash and a purchase through to payment, writing down every system and spreadsheet involved. The handoffs you find are usually where the value of an ERP sits.
Split every requirement into essential, valuable and nice to have. Without that split every vendor scores highly on everything and the comparison tells you nothing.
List the reports the business genuinely runs on and the questions leadership asks that nobody can currently answer quickly. These expose whether a platform's data model fits your business.
Every system that must exchange data: ecommerce, payroll, CRM, warehouse, EDI, banking. Note direction, frequency and whether real-time is genuinely required or simply assumed.
How many people work in the system daily against those who only approve or read reports. This drives licensing more than any other factor and is easy to get wrong in both directions.
Entities, currencies, sites and transaction volumes today and in three years. Buying for today alone is how businesses end up repeating this exercise far sooner than they planned.
Aim for three vendors. Two gives you no meaningful comparison and five spreads your team so thin that none of the evaluations is done properly. The work is in qualifying the long list down, and most of that can be done without a single demo.
Filter first on sector and size. A platform whose reference customers are 500-user manufacturers will be priced and staffed badly for a 25-user professional services firm, and the reverse is equally true. Ask each vendor directly for customers at your size in your industry before you book anything.
Filter next on the ecosystem. An ERP is a ten-year decision, so the availability of implementation partners, ongoing support, integrations and people who know the product in the job market all matter. A capable niche product with three UK partners is a genuine commercial risk.
Be sceptical of the requirements spreadsheet as a scoring tool. Vendors answer yes to almost everything, because almost everything is technically possible with enough configuration. What differentiates platforms is what they do well out of the box, which only shows up in a demo built on your own scenarios.
A standard demo shows the product at its best on the vendor's data. A scripted demo shows how it handles yours. Insist on the second.
Four or five real situations from your business: an urgent order against short stock, a job that overruns, a month end close, a supplier price change. Ask every vendor to demonstrate the same ones.
Even a small sample of your products, customers and pricing exposes assumptions that clean demo data hides, particularly around units of measure, pricing rules and how items are structured.
Have the people who will use the system daily watch the routine tasks, not the impressive ones. A process that takes twelve steps in a demo will take twelve steps two hundred times a week.
For every capability shown, establish whether it is out of the box, configuration, or custom development. That distinction determines both the quote and how painful future upgrades will be.
Ask who will actually run your project, how much of their time is allocated, and whether the consultant in the demo will still be involved at go-live. Sales and delivery are often different teams.
Ask for one of your genuinely awkward reports to be built live. How easily that happens tells you more about the data model than any amount of dashboard screenshots.
Build a three-year total for each shortlisted option rather than comparing monthly licence prices. Licensing is the visible number and often the smaller one. Implementation services, data migration, integrations and training usually exceed year-one licensing, sometimes by a wide margin.
Break licensing down by user type. Cloud ERP platforms differentiate between full users who work in finance and operations and light users who approve, submit timesheets or read reports. Getting that mix right changes the annual figure significantly, and vendors will quote whatever mix you give them.
Include the things quotes routinely omit: your own team's time, the data cleansing effort, testing, training beyond the initial sessions, and the change requests almost every business raises in the first year once people see what else the system can do. A contingency of ten to twenty per cent on services is realistic rather than pessimistic.
Then compare the support model. Response times, named contacts, whether training questions consume support hours, and how vendor release updates are tested against your configuration. Support is where most of the relationship actually happens and it is the part most often glossed over during selection.
Take references seriously and choose who you speak to. Ask for a customer at your size in your sector, and ask to speak to the finance lead or operations manager rather than the sponsor who signed the project off. The useful questions are what went wrong, what it cost beyond the quote, and what they would do differently.
Recognise that for most platforms the product decision and the partner decision are the same decision. The software is identical whoever supplies it. What differs is how well it is scoped, configured, migrated, integrated and supported, and those are entirely down to the people delivering it.
Weight the partner accordingly. Industry familiarity, the seniority of the named delivery team, and a willingness to push back on requirements they think are a bad idea are all stronger predictors of success than accreditation badges. A partner who agrees to everything tends to build expensive, fragile systems.
Finally, plan the internal side before signing. Name a project owner with authority to make decisions, protect their time, and agree who signs off process changes. ERP projects rarely fail on technology. They fail when nobody inside the business owns them.
If you are still working out whether an ERP is the right move, start with our guide to what an ERP system is, which covers the modules, how it differs from accounting software and the signals that a business has outgrown its current tools.
If you already know the direction and want to see how it applies to your sector, we have written practical guides on what an ERP changes across manufacturing, construction, professional services, wholesale, retail, healthcare and more.
And if Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is on your shortlist, our pricing breakdown and partner selection guide cover the two questions that come up most often in the final stages of evaluation.
Tell us where you are in the process and what you are weighing up. We'll talk through the requirements worth pinning down, the questions to put to each vendor and where projects like yours usually run into trouble.
Start with requirements rather than products. Document the processes that hurt today, separate must-haves from preferences, then shortlist three vendors whose customers look like you. Run scripted demos against your own scenarios, compare total cost over three years including implementation and support, and check references at your size and in your sector before committing.
Most mid-sized businesses take eight to sixteen weeks from starting requirements to signing. Rushing the requirements stage is the most common cause of a poor outcome, because vendors then quote against different assumptions and the comparison becomes meaningless.
Three is the practical number. Two gives you no real comparison, and five or more spreads your team so thin that no evaluation is done properly. Qualify hard on the long list so the three you demo are all genuinely viable.
Choosing on feature checklists rather than fit, letting a generic demo replace a scripted one built on your own scenarios, ignoring the implementation partner because the software is the same everywhere, comparing licence costs while omitting services and support, and underestimating how much internal time the project will consume.
In practice they are one decision. The software is identical whoever supplies it, so the partner determines how well it is configured, migrated, integrated and supported. Two businesses on the same platform can have completely different experiences of it because of who delivered the project.
Build a three-year total for every shortlisted option: licensing by user type, implementation services, data migration, integrations, training, and annual support. Add a contingency for change requests in year two, which almost every organisation makes. Comparing monthly licence prices alone is the fastest way to pick the most expensive option.