Spend tracked per award
Every cost carries its award and category, so eligibility is confirmed at commitment rather than at claim.
A practical look at what an ERP does for a research organisation, where the value sits, and how to choose a platform that tracks grant spend and produces funder reports from records.
Research income arrives as grants and contracts, each with eligibility rules, reporting dates and cost categories that differ from funder to funder.
An ERP (enterprise resource planning system) tracks spend against each award as it happens, so claims are accurate, deadlines are met and eligible cost is never missed.
Research management and lab systems keep their specialist role. The ERP governs money and evidence.
For most research organisations, an ERP is where the following live:
The value is evidence and recovery. Claiming everything you are entitled to and proving how it was spent.
Every cost carries its award and category, so eligibility is confirmed at commitment rather than at claim.
Indirect and estate cost allocated on agreed bases means bids reflect full economic cost rather than direct cost only.
Budget, commitments and actuals by project let PIs manage their award without asking finance for a report.
Transaction level detail with approvals makes funder audit a query rather than a project.
Accumulated eligible spend and reporting dates produce claims promptly, protecting cash flow.
Approval workflow and contract pricing for lab supplies and equipment reduce cost and improve compliance.
Data taken from a survey we commissioned in December 2024. Click here to view
of businesses are utilising an ERP
businesses are dissatisfied with their current ERP
of businesses say using an ERP has contributed to achieving business outcomes
Six everyday situations where one connected system changes the outcome.
Budget, phasing, cost categories and reporting dates are configured so tracking starts immediately.
Research finance is award driven and rule bound. These are the questions worth asking before you shortlist.
Finance, purchasing, stock, projects and reporting should sit in one system. Anything left in a spreadsheet quickly becomes the version everybody argues about at month end.
A system designed for a different sector rarely suits research organisations and institutes. The platform should reflect your real processes, approvals and cost structures rather than forcing a rewrite of how you operate.
Consolidation, reconciliation and management reporting should be routine rather than a fortnight of manual work. Ask to see a month end demonstrated, not described.
Role-based permissions, approval workflows and a complete audit trail should be built in, so compliance is a by-product of daily work rather than a separate exercise.
Cloud platforms with standard processes go live in weeks rather than years. A long implementation is usually a sign the system is being bent into shape.
New sites, entities, currencies or product lines shouldn't need a replacement system. Check licensing and functionality for where you expect to be in five years.
Once you know what an ERP should do, the question becomes which platform fits how your teams already work. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central brings finance, projects, purchasing and reporting into one cloud system connected to the Microsoft tools you already use.
For research organisations that means award level project accounting with budgets and commitments, procurement with approval workflow, overhead allocation, dimension reporting by funder, project and department, and Power BI dashboards for PIs and finance.
It connects to research management, HR and payroll systems through standard APIs, so staff cost and award data stay aligned.
It isn't just an accounting package. These are the capabilities teams tell us make the biggest difference day to day.
Ledgers, budgets, cash flow and management reporting run from the same data, with Power BI dashboards leadership can open themselves rather than waiting for a pack.
AI drafts descriptions, reconciles bank entries, chases anomalies and answers questions about your data, taking a chunk of routine admin off the finance team.
Approvals, quotes and reports work inside Outlook, Teams and Excel, so people use the tools they already know instead of learning another interface.
Approvals, alerts and handovers can be automated with Power Automate using low-code tools your own team can maintain.
Role-based access, approval limits and full traceability protect the financial and operational data research organisations are accountable for.
Start with finance and operations, then add supply chain, projects, service or Dynamics 365 CRM as you grow - without another migration.
No. Applications, ethics and outputs stay where they are. The ERP handles budgets, procurement, cost and funder reporting.
Yes. Each award has its own budget, categories and reporting basis, and spend is tagged accordingly.
Yes. Indirect and estate costs can be allocated on agreed bases so bids and claims reflect full cost.
Effort can be recorded and apportioned, so salary cost lands on the correct awards for claims.
Yes. Per user per month licensing suits smaller organisations needing serious grant control without an enterprise system.
Tell us how awards, procurement and funder reporting work today and we'll talk through what an ERP would change, which capabilities matter most and where to start. No obligation, just a straight conversation.